مجلة العلوم التربوية والاجتماعية

شرح التباين في مدى تطور أعضاء هيئة التدريس عبر مستويات البديهة الوظيفية والاستعدادية للمشاركة في التعليم عن بعد (دراسة تطبيقية سعودية)

Explaining the variability in the levels of faculty development by professional judgment and online willingness: Saudi empirical evidence

د. سامي بن غزاي السلمي
أستاذ الإدارة التربوية المساعد
قسم التربية - كلية الدعوة وأصول الدين -  الجامعة الإسلامية بالمدينة المنورة

Dr. Sami G. Alsulami
Assistant Professor of Educational Administration
Department of Education - Faculty of Da'wah and Fundamentals of Religion - Islamic University of Madinah

أ. موضي عزيز البلوي
باحثة دكتوراة - جامعة سيتون هول

Modhi Aziz Albalawi
PhD candidate - Seton Hall University

التخصص العام: الإدارة التربوية

التخصص الدقيق: القيادة التربوية

DOI: 10.36046/2162-000-007-009
DownloadPDF
الملخص

تهدف الدراسة إلى شرح الاختلاف في مستويات تطور أعضاء هيئة التدريس عبر متغيرين مستقلين هما مدى توظيف عضو هيئة التدريس لممارسات التقدير وحرية التصرف الوظيفي ومدى استعدادية عضو هيئة التدريس للمشاركة في بدائل التعليم المعاصرة مثل التعليم عن بعد.
واتبعت الدراسة المنهج التقليدي الكمي للبحث العلمي وذلك بهدف الوقوف على أثار المتغيرين المستقلين على متغير الدراسة.
وقامت الدراسة على مجتمع بيانات أعضاء هيئة تدريس بالجامعات السعودية وذلك لأهمية متغير الدراسة بالنسبة لرؤية 2030 فيما يتعلق بصياغة سياسات التعليم الحديث وإثراء رأس المال البشري والتركيز على جودة وتنافسية أعضاء هيئة التدريس.
وقد خلصت الدراسة إلى تقدير معاملات تغير ذو دلالة احصائية عند مستويات الشك التقليدية بقيمة 2.26 في حالة البديهة الوظيفية وقيمة 1.2 في حالة اتباع ثقافة التعليم عن بعد.

كلمات افتتاحية: مستوى تطور عضو هيئة التدريس، ممارسات التقدير وحرية التصرف الوظيفي، الاستعدادية، مشاركة عضو هيئة التدريس في بدائل التعليم المعاصر، التعليم عن بعد.



This study seeks to explore faculty development levels in Saudi higher education in connection with two qualities: discretion, defined as the exercise of professional judgement, and online willingness, defined as openness to a paradigm shift attaching increased importance to interactive and online education. Specifically, this study investigates the impact of each of these qualities on faculty development levels. Following a traditional scientific paradigm, the investigation centers on a quantitative analysis. Accordingly, the level of faculty development is specified in terms of the extent to which discretion is exercised and the degree of interactive deployment of online education activities. The study produces two parameter estimates statistically significant at all levels: first, it identifies a parameter estimate of 2.26 between the development levels of faculty members who exercise discretion and professional judgement and those who do not while controlling for online willingness; second, it identifies a parameter estimate of 1.2 between the development levels of faculty members displaying online willingness and those who do not while controlling for the exercise of discretion and professional judgement. By shedding light on the relationship of faculty discretion and online willingness to faculty development in Saudi higher education, the study contributes to the literature in a fashion particularly relevant in the context of the importance Saudi 2030 vision places on education, advanced technology, and human capital.
Keywords: Faculty development, paradigm shift, online willingness, professional judgement
مراجع

Alamer, S. M. (2014). Challenges facing gifted students in Saudi Arabia. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(24), 107-112.

Alghamdi, A. K. H. (2018). Faculty Professional Development and Its Impact on Teaching 

Strategies in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(2), 77-93.

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States, 2009. Sloan Consortium, Newburyport

Al Mulhim, E. (2014). The barriers to the use of ICT in teaching in Saudi Arabia: A review of literature. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(6), 487-493.

Beach, A. L., Sorcinelli, M. D., Austin, A. E., & Rivard, J. K. (2016). Faculty development in the 

age of evidence: Current practices, future imperatives. Stylus Publishing, LLC.

Blaye, A., & Chambres, P. (1991). Hypercard as a psychological research tool -- experimental studies. In A. Oliveira (Ed.) Hypermedia courseware: structures of communication and intelligent help. (PP: 34). SpringerVerlag

Condon, W., Iverson, E. R., Manduca, C. A., Rutz, C., & Willett, G. (2016). Faculty 

development and student learning: Assessing the connections. Indiana University Press.

Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A. & O'Malley, C. (1996) The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.) Learning in Humans and Machine: Towards an Interdisciplinary Learning Science (pp. 189- 211). Elsevier.

Fink, L. D. (2013). The current status of faculty development internationally. International 

Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 1-9.

Gaff, J. G. (1975). Toward faculty renewal: Advances in Faculty, Instructional, and Organizational Development. Jossey-Bass.

Gülbahar, Y., & Adnan, M. (2020). Faculty professional development in creating significant 

teaching and learning experiences online. In [Editors?] Handbook of research on creating meaningful experiences in online courses (pp. 37-58). IGI Global.

Gruppen, L. D., Frohna, A. Z., Anderson, R. M., & Lowe, K. D. (2003). Faculty development for educational leadership and scholarship. Academic Medicine, 78(2), 137-141.

Elliott, R. W., & Oliver, D. E. (2016). Linking faculty development to community college 

student achievement: A mixed methods approach. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40(2), 85-99.

Jacob, W. J., Xiong, W., & Ye, H. (2015). Professional development programmes at world-class universities. Palgrave Communications, 1(1), 1-27.

Kamal, B. (2013). Concerns and professional development needs of faculty at King Abdul-Aziz 

University in Saudi Arabia in adopting online teaching (Doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University).

Kamel, A. M. (2016). Role of faculty development programs in improving teaching and learning. Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences, 3(2), 61.

Lee, S. & Healy, M. (2008). Higher education in Southeast Asia: An overview. Academy, (2), 16.

Light, G., Calkins, S., Luna, M., & Drane, D. (2009). Assessing the impact of a year-long faculty development program on faculty approaches to teaching. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 168-181.

McLean, M., Cilliers, F., & Van Wyk, J. M. (2008). Faculty development: yesterday, today and 

tomorrow. Medical teacher, 30(6), 555-584.

McLeod, P. J., & Steinert, Y. (2010). The evolution of faculty development in Canada since the 1980s: Coming of age or time for a change? Medical Teacher, 32(1), e31-e35.

Omar, S. (2016). Concerns and professional development needs of faculty at King Saud 

University in Saudi Arabia in adopting online teaching (Doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University).

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1989). Classroom dialogues to promote self-regulated comprehension. Advances in Research on Teaching, 1, 35-71.

Perez, A. M., McShannon, J., & Hynes, P. (2012). Community college faculty development program and student achievement. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36(5), 379-385.

Phuong, T. T., Cole, S. C., & Zarestky, J. (2018). A systematic literature review of faculty 

development for teacher educators. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(2), 373-389.

Pleschov?, G., Simon, E., Quinlan, K. M., Murphy, J., & Roxa, T. (2012). The professionalization of academics as teachers in higher education. Science Position Paper. Standing Committee for the Social Sciences.

Steinert, Y. (Ed.). (2014). Faculty development in the health professions: a focus on research 

and practice (Vol. 11). Springer Science & Business Media.

Steinert, Y., Mann, K., Anderson, B., Barnett, B. M., Centeno, A., Naismith, L., ... & Ward, H. 

(2016). A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to enhance teaching effectiveness: A 10-year update: BEME Guide No. 40. Medical Teacher, 38(8), 769-786.

Stes, A., Coertjens, L., & Van Petegem, P. (2010). Instructional development for teachers in higher education: Impact on teaching approach. Higher Education, 60(2), 187-204.

Steinert, Y., Mann, K., Centeno, A., Dolmans, D., Spencer, J., Gelula, M., & Prideaux, D. (2006). A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Medical Teacher, 28(6), 497-526.

Stritter, F. T. (1983). Faculty evaluation and development. In C. H. McGuire, R. P. Foley, A. Gorr, R. W. Richards (Eds.), Handbook of Health Professions Education (pp. 294-318). Jossey-Bass.

Teferra, D., & Altbachl, P. G. (2004). African higher education: Challenges for the 21st century. Higher Education, 47(1), 21-50.

Ward, H. C., & Selvester, P. M. (2012). Faculty learning communities: Improving teaching in higher education. Educational Studies, 38(1), 111-121.

حقوق الطبع الجامعة الإسلامية بالمدينة المنورة © 2025