Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11. http://doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002
Alalwan, A. A., Baabdullah, A. M., Rana, N. P., Tamilmani, K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). Examining adoption of mobile internet in Saudi Arabia: Extending TAM with perceived enjoyment, innovativeness and trust. Technology in Society, 55, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.06.007
Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2019, December 31). Teens, Social Media & Technology 2018. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/
Anonymous (2006), “Thomson Learning and Turning Technologies Pilot Reveals College Students More Likely to Attend Class and Interact with Instructor as a Result of Added Technology Resources,” PR Newswire (Jan. 31), 1.
Arcos, C., Fuertes, W., Villacis, C., Zambrano, M., Noboa, T., Tacuri, A., Toulkeridis, T. (2016). Playful and interactive environment-based augmented reality to stimulate learning of children. 2016 18th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON). http://doi.org/10.1109/MELCON.2016.7495421
Balog, A., & Pribeanu, C. (2010). The Role of Perceived Enjoyment in the Students’ Acceptance of an Augmented Reality Teaching Platform: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Studies in Informatics and Control, 19(3),319-330. https://doi.org/10.24846/v19i3y201011
Becker, S.A., Brown, M., Dahlstrom, E., Davis, A., DePaul, K., Diaz, V., & Pomerantz, J. (2018). NMC Horizon Report: 2018 Higher Education Edition. Louisville, CO: Educause. https://library.educause.edu/~/media/files/library/2018/8/2018horizonreport.pdf
Beldad, A., & Hegner, S. (2018). Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with the inclusion of trust, social influence, and health valuation to determine the predictors of German users’ willingness to continue using a fitness app: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34 (9), 882–893. https://doi:10.1080/10447318.2017.1403220
Bojórquez, E. M., Villegas, O. O. V., Sánchez, V. G. C., García-Alcaraz, J. L., & Vara, J. F. (2016). Study on Mobile Augmented Reality Adoption for Mayo Language Learning. Mobile Information Systems, 2016, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1069581
Briz-Ponce, L., Pereira, A., Carvalho, L., Juanes-Méndez, J. A., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). Learning with mobile technologies–Students’ behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 612-620. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.027
Cabero-Almenara, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & Barroso-Osuna, J. (2019). Adoption of augmented reality technology by university students. Heliyon, 5(5).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01597
Chen, C.-P., & Wang, C.-H. (2015). Employing Augmented-Reality-Embedded Instruction to Disperse the Imparities of Individual Differences in Earth Science Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 835–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9567-3
Chen, Y.-C., Chi, H.-L., Hung, W.-H., & Kang, S.-C. (2011). Use of Tangible and Augmented Reality Models in Engineering Graphics Courses. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 137(4), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ei.1943-5541.0000078
Chiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J. H., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). An augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students’ learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352-365. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/17_4/24.pdf.
Chuah, S. H.-W., Rauschnabel, P.A., Krey, N., Nguyen, B., Ramayah, T., & Lde, S. (2016), Wearable technologies: The role of usefulness and visibility in smartwatch adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 276-284.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
Dimock, M. (2019, January 17). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Impact Lab RSS.http://www.impactlab.net/2019/03/27/defining-generations-where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/.
Erbas, C., & Demirer, V. (2019). The effects of augmented reality on students' academic achievement and motivation in a biology course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 450-458. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12350
Escobedo, L., & Tentori, M. (2014). Mobile Augmented Reality to Support Teachers of Children with Autism. Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence. Personalization and User Adapted Services Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13102-3_12
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1976). Misconceptions about the Fishbein model: Reflections on a study by Songer-Nocks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(6), 579–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(76)90036-6
Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Presented at the Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, The Ohio State University.
Haugstvedt, A.-C., & Krogstie, J. (2012). Mobile augmented reality for cultural heritage: A technology acceptance study. 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). https://doi.org/10.1109/ismar.2012.6402563
Ho, S., Hsieh, S., Sun, P., & Chen, C. (2017). To activate English learning: Listen and speak in real life context with an AR featured U-learning system. Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 176-187.
Hsin-Hun, L., Yang, S. J. H., Chen, S. Y. and Wernhuar, T. (2017). The influences of the 2d image-based augmented reality and virtual reality on student learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 20(3), 110-121
Hsu, T.-C. (2017). Learning English with Augmented Reality: Do learning styles matter? Computers & Education, 106, 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.007
Huang, Y.-M. (2016). The factors that predispose students to continuously use cloud services: Social and technological perspectives. Computers & Education, 97, 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.016
Ibáñez, M.-B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002
Ibili, E., Resnyansky, D., & Billinghurst, M. (2019). Applying the technology acceptance model to understand maths teachers’ perceptions towards an augmented reality tutoring system. Education and Information Technologies, 24(5), 2653–2675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09925-z
Khan, T., Johnston, K., & Ophoff, J. (2019). The Impact of an Augmented Reality Application on Learning Motivation of Students. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2019, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7208494
Kim, K., Hwang J, Zo H, Lee H (2016) Understanding users’ continuance intention toward smartphone augmented reality applications. Inf Dev 32:161–174.
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 40(3), 1–14.
Lemay, D., Doleck, T., & Bazelais, P. (2019). Context and technology use: Opportunities and challenges of the situated perspective in technology acceptance research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 2450–2465. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12859.
Leue, M.C., tom Dieck, D., & Jung, T. (2014). A Theoretical Model of Augmented Reality Acceptance. eReview of Tourism Research, 5, 1-5.
Lin, H. F., & Chen, C. H. (2017). Combining the technology acceptance model and uses and gratifications theory to examine the usage behavior of an augmented reality tour-sharing application. Symmetry, 9(7), 113. https://doi:10.3390/sym9070113
Liou, W. K., Bhagat, K. K., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). Beyond the Flipped Classroom: A Highly Interactive Cloud-Classroom (HIC) Embedded into Basic Materials Science Courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 460-473.
Liu, S. (2019, December 13). Global augmented reality market size 2025. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/897587/world-augmented-reality-market-value/.
Luan, W. S., & Teo, T. (2009). Investigating the Technology Acceptance among Student Teachers in Malaysia: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.3860/taper.v18i2.1327
Lytridis, C., & Tsinakos, A. (2018). Evaluation of the AR Tutor augmented reality educational platform in tertiary education. Smart Learning Environments 5(1), 6. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-018-0058-x
Martín‐García, A. V., Martínez‐Abad, F., & Reyes‐González, D. (2019). TAM and stages of adoption of blended learning in higher education by application of data mining techniques. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2484–2500. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12831
Maziriri, E. T., Gapa, P., & Chuchu, T. (2020). Student Perceptions Towards the use of YouTube as An Educational Tool for Learning and Tutorials. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 119-138. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1329a
Munir, A. R., & Ilyas, G. B. (2017). Extending the technology acceptance model to predict the acceptance of customer toward mobile banking service in Sulawesi selatan. International Journal of Economic Research,14(4), 365–375
National Education Portal (iEN) (2020). Ien National Education e-Portal. Available at: https://ien.edu.sa [Accessed 8 March 2020]
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017). Mobile-based assessment: Investigating the factors that influence behavioral intention to use. Computers & Education, 109, 56–73.
Petrock, V. (2019, March 27). Virtual and Augmented Reality Users 2019. eMarketer. https://www.emarketer.com/content/virtual-and-augmented-reality-users-2019.
Radosavljevic, S., Radosavljevic, V., & Grgurovic, B. (2018). The potential of implementing augmented reality into vocational higher education through mobile learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 404-418. https://doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1528286
Rauschnabel, P. A., & Ro, Y. K. (2016). Augmented reality smart glasses: an investigation of technology acceptance drivers. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 11(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtmkt.2016.075690
Revythi, A., & Tselios, N. (2019). Extension of technology acceptance model by using system usability scale to assess behavioral intention to use e-learning. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2341–2355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09869-4
Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). MLearning and pre-service teachers: An assessment of the behavioral intention using an expanded TAM model. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 644–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.061
Sánchez‐Prieto, J. C., Huang, F., Olmos‐Migueláñez, S., García‐Peñalvo, F. J., & Teo, T. (2019). Exploring the unknown: The effect of resistance to change and attachment on mobile adoption among secondary pre‐service teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2433–2449. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12822
Scrivner, O., Madewell, J., Buckley, C., & Perez, N. (2016). Augmented reality digital technologies (ARDT) for foreign language teaching and learning. 2016 Future Technologies Conference (FTC). https://doi.org/10.1109/ftc.2016.7821639
Suki, N. M., & Suki, N. M. (2011). Exploring the relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived enjoyment, attitude and subscribers’ intention towards using 3G mobile services. Journal of Information Technology Management, 22(1), 1–7.
Šumak, B., Heričko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2067–2077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.005
Sytwu, T.-A., & Wang, C.-H. (2015). An Investigation of the Effects of Individual Differences on Mobile-Based Augmented Reality English Vocabulary Learning. Mobile Learning Design Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, 387–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0027-0_23
Teo, T., & Huang, F. (2018). Investigating the influence of individually espoused cultural values on teachers’ intentions to use educational technologies in Chinese universities. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1489856.
Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2011). An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1645–1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.002
Ursavaş, Ö. F., Yalçın, Y., & Bakır, E. (2019). The effect of subjective norms on preservice and in‐service teachers’ behavioural intentions to use technology: A multigroup multimodel study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2501–2519. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12834
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008), Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision sciences, 39(2), 273–315.
Wang, Y.-H. (2017). Exploring the effectiveness of integrating augmented reality-based materials to support writing activities. Computers & Education, 113, 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.013
Weng, F., Yang, R.-J., Ho, H.-J., & Su, H.-M. (2018). A TAM-Based Study of the Attitude towards Use Intention of Multimedia among School Teachers. Applied System Innovation, 1(3), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi1030036
Wojciechowski, R., & Cellary, W. (2013). Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Computers & Education, 68, 570–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.014
Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2017). Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028.
Yalcin, M. E., & Kutlu, B. (2019). Examination of students' acceptance of and intention to use learning management systems using extended TAM. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2414–2432. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12798
Yoon, S. A., Anderson, E., Lin, J., & Elinich, K. (2017, January). How Augmented Reality Enables Conceptual Understanding of Challenging Science Content. Educational Technology & Society 20(1):156, 20(1), 156-168
Yuen, A. H. K., Cheng, M., & Chan, F. H. F. (2019). Student satisfaction with learning management systems: A growth model of belief and use. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 2520–2535. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.1283.