فاعلية اختلاف نمط تصميم الاختبارات المحوسبة على خفض مستوى قلق الاختبار والتحصيل المؤجل لدى طلاب كلية التربية في جامعة طيبة

The effectiveness of the difference in the design of computerized tests in reducing the level of test anxiety and deferred achievement among students of the College of Education at Taibah University

د. باسم بن نايف محمد الشريف

Dr. Bassem bin Nayef Mohammed Al Shareef

الكلمات المفتاحية: الاختبارات المحوسبة، قلق الاختبار، التحصيل، معالجة المعلومات، المثيرات البصرية السمعية., computerized tests, test anxiety, achievement, information processing, audiovisual stimuli.

هدفت الدراسة الحالية إلى رصد قياس فاعلية اختلاف نمط تصميم الاختبارات المحوسبة على خفض مستوى قلق الاختبار والتحصيل المؤجل لدى طلاب كلية التربية في جامعة طيبة وفق نظام معالجة المعلومات، ولتحقيق هذا الهدف تم اختيار عينة تكونت من (63) طالباً تم توزيعهم بطريقة عشوائية على مجموعتين، المجموعة الأولى تكونت من (32) طالباً تقدموا للاختبار المحوسب متعدد المثيرات (الوسائط السمعية البصرية) وتكونت المجموعة الثانية من (31) طالباً تقدموا للاختبار المحوسب بمؤثر واحد (وسائط بصرية). وقد استخدم الباحث المنهج شبه التجريبي، كما تم بناء اختبار تحصيل محوسب في مقرر التعلم الإلكتروني، وبناء مقياس آخر لقلق الاختبار.

 وقد أظهرت نتائج الدراسة وجود فروق ذات دلالة إحصائية في مستوى التحصيل بين نمطي الاختبار المحوسب؛ حيث جاءت الفروق لصالح نمط الاختبار المحوسب بمثيرات متعددة، كما أظهرت النتائج أيضاً وجود فروق ذات دلالة إحصائية في مستوى درجة قلق الاختبار بين نمطي الاختبار المحوسب؛ حيث جاءت الفروق لصالح نمط الاختبار المحوسب بمثيرات متعددة، وفي ضوء هذه النتائج أوصت الدراسة بتبني الاختبارات المحوسبة وتصميمها وفق نظام معالجة المعلومات الرقمية بالكوادر البشرية.


العمري، محمد، وعيادات، يوسف. (2016). تصورات اعضاء هيئة التدريس والطلبة حول الاختبارات المحوسبة في العملية التعليمية التعلمية. المجلة الأردنية في العلوم التربوية، 12(4)، 469 – 478.

سالم، هبة. (2016). قلق الاختبار وعلاقته بموضع الضبط والضغوط النفسية والتحصيل الدراسي لدى طالبات كلية التربية جامعة حائل بالمملكة العربية السعودية. مجلة العلوم التربوية، 3(1)، 327-356.

الخزي، فهد. (2013). اثر قلق الاختبارات الإلكترونية على الأداء في الاختبارات الإلكترونية. المجلة الدولية للأبحاث التربوية، 33 58 -  90.

بدوي، محمد. (2014). فاعلية برنامج مقترح في التعليم الإلكتروني لتنمية مهارات تصميم الاختبارات الإلكترونية والاتجاه نحو التقويم الإلكتروني لدى طلاب الدراسات العليا. المجلة الدولية التربوية المتخصصة 3(5)146-176.


References:

Alessio, H., Malay, N., Maurer, K., Bailer, A. & Rubin, B. (2017). Examining the Effect of Proctoring on Online Test Scores. Online Learning Journal, 21(1),. 

Al-khazi, Fahad. (2013). The effect of electronic test anxiety on performance in electronic tests. International Journal of Educational Research, 33 58-90.

AL-Omari, Muhammad, and Eydat, Youssef. (2016). Perceptions of faculty members and students about computerized tests in the teaching-learning process. The Jordanian Journal of Educational Sciences, 12 (4), 469-478.

Anderson, K., Peters, M. & Willis, J. (2020). Distance Learning Mathematics Courses and Testing Environments: Academic Integrity and Test Anxiety. In D. Schmidt-Crawford (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 210-215). Online: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). 

Badawi, Muhammad. (2014). The effectiveness of a proposed program in e-learning to develop the skills of designing electronic tests and the trend towards electronic evaluation among graduate students. International Journal of Specialized Education 3 (5) 146-176.

Chaiyasoonthorn, W. (2019). Decision Making in Selecting Mobile Payment Systems. International Association of Online Engineering. Retrieved June 27, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/216572/.

Dahdouh, K., Dakkak, A., Oughdir, L. & Messaoudi, F. (2018). Big Data for Online Learning Systems. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2783-2800. Retrieved June 26, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/191607/.

Daniels, L.M. & Gierl, M.J. (2017). The impact of immediate test score reporting on university students' achievement emotions in the context of computer-based multiple-choice exams. Learning and Instruction, 52(1), 27-35. Elsevier Ltd. 

Gullen, K. (2014). Are Our Kids Ready for Computerized Tests?. Educational Leadership, 71(6), 68-71. Retrieved November 13, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/153597/.

Kolski, T. & Weible, J. (2018). Examining the Relationship between Student Test Anxiety and Webcam Based Exam Proctoring. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 21(3),. 

Lee, J.A. & Hopkins, L.(2020). The Effects of Training on Computerized Aptitude Test Performance and Anxiety. Retrieved June 28, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/137256/.

Lin, L. (2020). An Evaluation System and Its Model for Educational Competitiveness of Universities. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(11), 188-201. Kassel, Germany: International Journal of Emerging Technology in Learning. 

List, J.A., Livingston, J.A. & Neckermann, S. (2018). Do financial incentives crowd out intrinsic motivation to perform on standardized tests?. Economics of Education Review, 66(1), 125-136. Elsevier Ltd. 

Lu, H., Hu, Y.p., Gao, J.j. & Kinshuk. (2016). The effects of computer self-efficacy, training satisfaction and test anxiety on attitude and performance in computerized adaptive testing. Computers & Education, 100(1), 45-55. Elsevier Ltd. 

Lufi, D. & Darliuk, L. (2020). The interactive effect of test anxiety and learning disabilities among adolescents. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(4), 236-249. Elsevier Ltd. 

Lunz, M.E. (2020).Test-Retest Consistency of Computer Adaptive Tests. Retrieved September 8, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/142578/.

Maravić Čisar, S., Čisar, P. & Pinter, R. (2016). Evaluation of knowledge in Object Oriented Programming course with computer adaptive tests. Computers & Education, 92(1), 142-160. Elsevier Ltd. 

Mayer, R.E. (2008). Applying the Science of Learning: Evidence-Based Principles for the Design of Multimedia Instruction. American Psychologist, 63(8), 760-769.

Mehdinezhad, V. & Bamari, Z. (2015). The Relationship between Test Anxiety, Epistemological Beliefs and Problem Solving among Students. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research (NAER Journal), 4(1), 2-8. University of Alicante. 

Nardi, A. & Ranieri, M. (2019). Comparing paper‐based and electronic multiple‐choice examinations with personal devices: Impact on students' performance, self‐efficacy and satisfaction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1495-1506. Wiley. 

Naumann, A., Rieser, S., Musow, S., Hochweber, J. & Hartig, J. (2019). Sensitivity of test items to teaching quality. Learning and Instruction, 60(1), 41-53. Elsevier Ltd. 

Nugroho, S., Budiyanto, C. & Budianto, A. (2018). Technology Acceptance Model for Examining the Feasibility of a Computer-based Test System (an Indonesian Context). Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education, 2(2), 105-116. Universitas Sebelas Maret. 

Obeidallah, R. & Shdaifat, A. (2020). An Evaluation and Examination of Quiz Tool within Open-Source Learning Management Systems. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(10), 191-201. Kassel, Germany: International Journal of Emerging Technology in Learning. 

Overbaugh, R.C. (2020). The Effects of Instructional Content, Brief Instructional Activities, and Learning Modality on Teacher Education Students' Computer Anxiety. 

Poorman, S.G., Mastorovich, M.L. & Gerwick, M. (2019). Interventions for test anxiety: How faculty can help. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 14(3), 186-191. Elsevier Ltd. 

Powell, Z.E.(2020). Test Anxiety and Test Performance Under Computerized Adaptive Testing Methods. Retrieved June 28, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/145166/.

Ranieri, M. & Nardi, A. (2018). ON PAPER OR ON SCREEN? A STUDY ON THE PERCEPTIONS OF DIGITAL TESTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 56-70. Ortona, Italy: Edizioni Menabò - Menabò srl. 

Roick, J. & Ringeisen, T. (2017). Self-efficacy, test anxiety, and academic success: A longitudinal validation. International Journal of Educational Research, 83(1), 84-93. Elsevier Ltd. 

Romi, I. (2017). A Model for e-Learning Systems Success: Systems, Determinants, and Performance. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 12(10), 4-20. Kassel, Germany: International Journal of Emerging Technology in Learning. 

Rosen, G.A. (2000). Computer-Based Testing: Test Site Security. Presented at National Council on Measurement in Education New Annual Meeting 2000. Retrieved September 8, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/88221/.

Rossano, V., Pesare, E. & Roselli, T. (2017). Are Computer Adaptive Tests suitable for assessment in MOOCs. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(3),. Italian e-Learning Association. 

Rostaminezhad, M. (2019). Students’ Perceptions of the Strengths and Limitations of Electronic Tests Focusing on Instant Feedback. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18(1), 59-71. Informing Science Institute. 

Salem, Heba. (2016). Test anxiety and its relationship to the locus of control, psychological stress and academic achievement among students of the College of Education, University of Hail, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Educational Sciences, 3 (1), 327-356.

Sattar, Z. (2019). A Practical E-Test System. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(21), 110-122. Kassel, Germany: International Journal of Emerging Technology in Learning. Retrieved June 27, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/217205/.

Shdaifat, A. & Obeidallah, R. (2019). Quiz Tool Within Moodle and Blackboard Mobile Applications. International Association of Online Engineering. 

Simanjuntak, V. (2017). Relations Entrance Test Interview with Learning Outcomes. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 197-200. STKIP Singkawang. 

Wise, S.L. (2020). The Role of Anxiety in Examinee Preference for Self-Adapted Testing. Retrieved June 29, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/147189/.

Wulansari, A., Kumaidi, K. & Hadi, S. (2019). Two Parameter Logistics Model with Lognormal Response Time for Computer-based Testing. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(15), 138-158. Kassel, Germany: International Journal of Emerging Technology in Learning. 

Yang, Y., Taylor, J. & Cao, L. (2016). The 3 x 2 Achievement Goal Model in Predicting Online Student Test Anxiety and Help-Seeking. The Journal of Distance Education / Revue de l'ducation Distance, 31(1),. Athabasca University Press. 

Zolait, A. & El, S. (2019). Automated Test Paper Generation Using Utility Based Agent and Shuffling Algorithm. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 14(1), 69-83. IGI Global. Retrieved June 12, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/185521/.